I'll try to organize some of my posts into categories here.

#### My Approach

*These are posts which provide some degree of exposition, explaining what approaches I think are most worthwhile.*

Why Relational Methods: I lay out my basic referential generality requirement (a general machine intelligence system should be able to represent any kind of pattern that a human can) and its most important consequence (relational methods are needed for general intelligence).

Why Logic: I explain why I prefer to think about logical knowledge representations rather than procedural knowledge representations.

Beliefs: I briefly review what we know about how local probabilistic beliefs can usefully interact.

#### Questioning My Approach

*Although laying out my views on my blog has long-term value to me, I get more short-term value by trying to disprove my views, hopefully to improve them.*

*Truth and AI: Reasons to doubt my referential generality requirement.*

Bayesianism?: A continuation, with a more direct questioning of Bayesianism.

My Unhealthy Obsession with Message Passing: I really like the idea of local beliefs which interact via message-passing algorithms. Is this healthy?

#### The Procedural Logic Sequence

*This is a sequence of posts trying to find an answer to the vague question "How can we make a logic which exists inside time?". What I mean by this is a logic which includes a representation of its own inference process. The goal of the line of thinking shifts over time, though.*

Self-Modifying Logic: Not really starting to talk about procedural logic yet, but it's where the sequence started.

More on Self-Modifying Logic: Here I start to talk about (self-modifying) inference control.

Action Logic: Starts the topic in earnest, giving an overview of existing systems from a "logic of action" perspective.

Procedural Logic: Re-naming the project because "action logic" is already taken, I continue the line of thought.

Procedural Logic Once Again: A year later, a quick summary of the thoughts I've had in that time. Enthusiasm about Dyna begins.

Procedural Logic Answers: More Dyna enthusiasm, as well as some thoughts about generalizations.

Useful Meta-Analysis: A few more things to think about concerning self-guidance.

#### Truth, Finally

*This is a sequence in which I examine a possible route to a satisfying theory of truth.*

Old Demons: I try to convince myself not to worry about it.

Impredicative Truth: A solution is proposed.

New Truth: Intuition: I examine the solution a bit.

Problems I Didn't Solve: I outline some stuff this theory doesn't do.

Impredicative Truth: A solution is proposed.

New Truth: Intuition: I examine the solution a bit.

Problems I Didn't Solve: I outline some stuff this theory doesn't do.